The benefits&limitations&ethical implications of a research method in Essay

The benefits&limitations& honourable implications of a research method in the context of a particular methodology - Essay theoretical accountIn participant posting the research worker takes part or becomes involved in the existing activities of the conjunction and document expressions. Generally the observer assumes the role being explored (Flick, 2009). However, similar to other research methods, participant bill in the context of ethnography has benefits and limitations. This essay explores these strengths and weaknesses, as well as its ethical implications. Benefits and Limitations Participant ceremony grants the researcher the opportunity to explore phenomenon from the inside. They are valuable in ethnography when behaviours and thoughts can be place and appreciated best in their natural situation or when the observer plans to explore social kinetics or pagan trend over a period of time. They generate a wide military of information or knowledge about the responses of i ndividuals and provide researchers the opportunity to build theories from the information gathered (Hume & Mu, 2004). However, the severalise benefit of participant observation for ethnography is that it produces an accurate understanding of how individuals perform their daily activities or tasks. It presents candid knowledge of how individuals view cultural or societal processes, norms, and roles when studied methodically, which implies that the researcher is not only acting an observation but is also examining contexts, situations, or relationships with an assumption of how interaction or communication essential be taking place (Kirby, 2000). Hence, participant observation within the context of ethnography is a field that must be known to all corporate or organisational professionals. A perfect example is how Gary DiCamillo, the CEO of Polaroid Corporation, acted when he took on the corporate position in the 1990s (Stacks, 2010, 191). Aside from interviewing the members of the organisation, he checked the different Polaroid sites, visited the mold centres and facilities, and participated in dialogues about the confederacy with managers and employees. Due to his continuous participant observation, he was able to bring out the companys strong and weak points, and to plan his future actions for Polaroid (Stacks, 2010, 191). In essence, according to Gummesson (1999), participant observation gives the researcher the chance to have a profound, compassionate, and culturally-sensitive knowledge of how individuals perceive the world. It is particularly valuable in the exploratory soma of an ethnographic study (Myers, 2008), when researchers have an unclear or indefinite idea of what they are trying to discover or understand and an unclear idea of what they will define out. The major limitation of participant observation within the context of ethnography involves the amount of effort, time, and related costs it requires (Bryman & Bell, 2007). In addition, bec ause participant observation primarily requires only one researcher in a particular social situation, it is not easy to find out if other researchers would evaluate aspects similarly and it is not easy to determine how generally results may be related to other situations (Symon & Cassell, 1998 Collis & Hussey, 2009). Thus one of the major limitations of participant observation is reliability. In summary, the strengths of participant observation are as follows the researcher is responsive to new ideas it can analyse the deepest aspects of social processes or cultural dynamics it assumes the role or perspective of