Care and Belonging

Jessica D experienceie Professor Troy McGinnis Reading Journal origination 1 October 4, 2012 Care and Belonging in the Market by Allison J. Pugh Allison J. Pugh took the speech communication right out of my mouth when writing her clause on parents outgo too much bullion on material items for their children. Commodity ingestion for children has exploded to $670 billion spent annually on or by children in the United states in 2004 and there is a good prospect its only take inting higher.She branches off in the article going into several(prenominal) different topics on how the adults and children are effected by their require to demand to belong in society and how it affects the relationship between the parents and the children. It also focuses on the corporate marketers and how they tend to sell a fantasy to the children, reeling them into having a intrust to commence the product. This being done by the marketers, it also allows the parents to have the desire for their child ren, resulting in dealing the product.As I was reading this article, it made me think of my childishness evolution up and how I related so close to this topic. For me, I didnt have a lot training up so I found myself struggling with wanting all the same things my friends had that my parents couldnt always afford. My parents two worked full time jobs to provide for me and my two older brothers. Allison J. Pugh states in the article that low-income parents often planned ahead and save up to be suitable to buy their children what they ask for and I saw my parents do this for me and my brothers for Christmas and our birthdays.My parents taught me at a young age to stay humble and that material things dont define me as a person. I carry this lesson with my everyday life now. I shape my father now buying my two younger half sisters some(prenominal) and everything they could ever want. I see him trying to make up for the things he couldnt roll me while growing up. It also points o ut that your parents dont buy you things for the enjoyment of themselves they simply do it because they have a fear f non wanting their kid to scent left out or feel as if they dont belong. My five and nine year old sister has been by means of 2 iPads, iPod touches, cell phones and numerous amounts of toys, each. I find them being muck up at such a young age is going to provide them to grow up not saying the meaning of what a privilege it is to have nice things. Naturally everyone has a desire to fit in and be accepted by society, that wont ever change. As you get older, you are more aware of your status in society.You come to understand how society works, the interaction between people and the meanings of symbols in your day-to-day life. I do believe if more kids are exposed to valuable lessons growing up and not just get things handed to them, the chances of them taking these things for disposed(p) is less and maybe they wont feel the need to have the newest gibe of Air J ordans or the latest iPhone just because everyone else does. I asked myself a fewer questions as I read through the article.One being, how was I effected by what my parents bought me growing up? Why does society look devour on others if they dont have the best of the best? Will this ever change? I started to pay attention to children and their parents when I was at the store, work and when I was at the mall the other day. I feel as if parents these days more or less buy their kids love by giving into what they want even if its something ridiculous. Parents give in way too easily and the kids catch on to what they stooge and cant get away with.This also being a line when trying to persuade your parents that you absolutely need the new Nintendo DS or else your life is over. She spent time with families who were low-income families and richer families. She noticed that affluent parents practiced a convention a form of symbolic deprivation pointing to particularly meaningful goods or experiences that their child didnt not have as evidence of their own moral restraint and worthiness as parents. I had to break that down to really understand what she meant by that.I think she means the affluent parents buy their children material things because they can and they want to stay higher up on the ladder in society. As for most low-income parents, they implemented a form of symbolic indulgence. Making sure that those particular goods or experiences have the most significant symbolic value for the childrens social world. They did the best they could with the resources they had and sometimes putting those items more important than anything else at that time.Id be lying if I was to say that I think this explosion of parents spending ridiculous amounts of money to shape their childs social status is going to change anytime soon. I dont think it leave alone ever change. Its practically an unwritten rule in society. Parents will continue to do anything they can to make t he kids be accepted by society and make them feel as comfortable as they grow older and make their way into the real world.