Why Evolution and Religion Can Coexist

Jason Soares 1-1 Science and Religion Can Coexist Re hatful 2 For centuries acquirement and religious belief have been competing with each other to reign self-governing over the other. It makes unitary wonder just why it has come to this. aft(prenominal) al mavin arent they in numerous aspects kind-hearted of similar? apportion the following the theory of evolution, the elephantine bang theory, and the Copenhagen interpretation theory entirely have one constant term, theory. Why? All of them harbourt been proven in time as they are still sheer theories. outright shifting over to godliness, when reading a holy book, one finds no facts or substantial evidence of how things exist as they do to mean solar day. Religion, as much of erudition, is merely based on article of opinions. Yet billions choose to twain believe in a higher being or stub out the idea of a deity altogether. No matter which side is dead on target or false, one true statement that shag be do is that one could non exist without the other. Religion is for spiritual healing and belief whereas, lore is, in about cases, the actual embodiment of our beliefs.Science and religion freighter coexist because arguably the greatest mind of them all said so, religions morals and value uses intuition to the benefit of all mankind, and perhaps theology himself used science to create all that we see. Firstly, if indisputably the greatest scientist in the history of mankind, Albert whizz the person who set the base for modern science as we know it today found no problem in believing in twain science and religion, then why should we?Einstein did not believe in a personal God, a god who cares for us or intervenes in the lives of people, scarce in one that hold and created the harmony of the universe a god nonetheless. That may seem quite odd as some(prenominal) beliefs render science and religion incompatible. Yet, many scientists, according to surveys, rank that there is n o conflict between their faith and their work. Joel Primack, a professor from the University of California, Santa Cruz, co-developed the cold dark matter theory that seeks to explicate the formation and structure of the universe.He also believes in God and that God and science ass exist in harmony. He claims that in the last some years astronomy has come together so that were now equal to(p) to tell a coherent story of how the universe began, Primack said. This story does not contradict God, but instead enlarges the idea of God. (National Geographic News website) This is one example of how clearly science and religion go hand in hand. Secondly, most religions in this world teach three basic move in being able to enter the eternal brio that most of them offer respect one some other, love your neighbour and be kind to all.Not a bad list on which to base a exclusively religion on. In fact it sounds quite noble. Think about it, many lives are based on the above list due to a st rict enforcing of religion from family or a community, and if even a elfin portion of those people grow up to be doctors and scientists, we can affirm with ease that the future of our technological advancements is bright and it is in the right hands. subsequently analyzing the upbringing of these theoretical people, we can come to a conclusion that religion helped a great deal in steering their science-filled future in the right direction.It will be foolish on our part to refuse religion just because weve advanced in science and technology. As our companionship increases, we must move nearer to the roots of our religion, and this is the stage when both religion and science will be working together for the betterment of mankind. For example, euthanasia, the cleanup spot of a gentlemans gentleman being to relieve pain and suffering (mercy-killing), is widely considered unethical. This mercy-killing is just a euphemism for suicide. The reason why we dont ordinate suicide is be cause it is usually frowned upon by society, yet when someone is on a hospital bed and doesnt want to live anymore, its justified.People presuppose suicide and mercy-killing are different, but they both lead to the same resolvent the killing of a human being because the person no lifelong has a desire to live. By definition, this is indeed suicide because it is taking a life away since they no longer find value for it, and yet it is being done throughout the world in public hospitals. Now a doctor with a good moral and ethical footing due to religion or a community with strong values would not succumb to the pressures of this daily occurrence. And arent doctors supposed to bring life into this world and help sustain it when outside forces threaten it?Moreover, it is daunting to calculate that someone can just pull the plug on another being just because the former wants to die. Science and technology can be a blessing in the hands of wise men, while it can be deadly in the hands of others, and if we are wiser and nearer to our religious roots we can enjoy our lives better knowing that religions morals and values will use science to the benefit of all mankind. Thirdly, possibly one of the most controversial and heated theories of all is the one that concerns the very place in which we live in, the big bang theory.According to the big bang theory, space, time, and all matter around us was created by the grandest flare-up ever to occur in our universe. When consulting religious persons about this theory they would alone heartedly disagree with it. Assuming they were Catholics, they would immediately refer to the Bible and cite that God created the world, the vegetation, animals, and humans within it. Now level headed persons who are on incomplete side of the science-religion debate would argue that, why cant both the big bang theory and the biblical story of God be true?They would reason that perhaps God used this method of fundament for His own purpose, to create a world that is habitable by life. once again the religious would disagree, saying that according to the book of Genesis, God created nation in seven old age, and according to the big bang theory the earth took billions of years to develop in order to exhibit any traces of human life. Seven days compared to billions of years is quite a difference, yet when examining the give-and-take of God in the Bible, the religious cannot take the seven day pointedness so literally.Perhaps it did take God seven days to create the earth, but maybe God was on a different time scale. unmatchable day for us is twenty four hours, but one day for God could have been thousands, millions, or billions of years. Furthermore, perhaps these seven days werent consecutive. They could have been spanned out over billions of years and just the major days on which God created his most applaused wonders are mentioned. In addition to the beingness process of the earth, God could have used the scien tific methods of photosynthesis, natural selection, and immeasurable others to create this world.Not only can we bring science and religion close at hand(predicate) together than ever by this new perspective, but we can say that one definitely assisted in the process of the other and that the birth between science and religion is strong. Ultimately, one can see that science and religion can coexist, because many of our brightest minds are an example of this, science can be used for worthy causes due to religions ethics, and with a new perspective it can be debated that God himself used science for his own creation purposes. No one is forced to sway either way of the debate and everyone is elcomed to stay neutral, nonetheless, one cannot obliviously deny one and praise the other with an un-open mind. We can choose to believe one, but we shouldnt lour the other altogether. All we should ask of ourselves is not to ignore the pressing questions which depart our views on religion or science, but to expand our tunnel vision and wander into unfamiliar territories to grasp a better understanding of both consequently closing the gap between science and religion so that one day the feud between the two may tolerate peacefully in the minds of all.