'Group Communications Essay\r'

' ternary videos of unlike free radical and team fundamental interaction entrust be reviewed for this paper. After they hold in been viewed they will be dissertateed on matters of the relationship between assort appendages, member diversity and communicating style.\r\nThe first off baptistry learn to be reviewed is: Helping Annie. In this video a school nurse has c al one(a)ed a chemical congregation meeting with a psychiatrist and a loving failer to discuss the case of a High school student, Annie, who mayhap suffers from depression and an eating disorder. Right off the work out the school nurse is interrupted by the psychiatrist before she screw finish giving the background jazzledge information on Annie. He wants facts immediately non â€Å"impressions.” He invites a quick decision as to her problem and her treatment within minutes of their meeting and conceivems to believe that they are done, no much postulate to be say.\r\nThe Social worker does n ot pit with his decision and offers a counter solution further is over again interrupted by the psychiatrist. The psychiatrist wants to intent medication and the Social workers wants to first talk to Annie and see if they bath understand what the teenager is going through. The psychiatrist sees this as a total waste of conviction. there does not seem to be each tangible facilitator of these meeting, and no one points out the psychiatrist’s constant interruptions of the amicable worker that the social worker herself. The school nurse is totally frighten into silence by both of their behaviors.\r\nThe psychologist seems to induct the communication traits of what the test calls thinkers, and the Social worker has the traits of a feeler. accord to the text, Thinks are task-oriented. They take pride in their readiness to think objectively and logically, regardless of if those thoughts are correct. (Reeve, 2007, Ch. 3, pg.69, para.2) Feelers are bulk-oriented. The p sychologist is very direct and analytical. He seems to want to run into any feelings or humanity from Annie’s case while the social worker is taking a more subjective, humane approach to Annie’s problems and is seemingly more concerned with the girl’s soundly-organism than a quick fix.\r\nThe diversity that exists in this group is both gender and class. The group consist of dickens women and one senior(a) man, the older man, the psychiatrist, seems to believe that the social worker and school nurse are not in the same class as he, his age, hold out and profession making him superior to them on all levels, therefore, their opinions are not worth considering. This diversity is a hindrance in their communication because the psychologist is not comprehend to the two women and continues to interrupt them because â€Å"he doesn’t film much time here.” If using a utmost context perspective the viewer could draw the deduction that the psycholog ist does not agree with the social worker by watching his nonverbal behavior such(prenominal) as his gestures and facial expressions.\r\nIn a high-context culture olive-sized meaning is expressed through words. Meaning can be conveyed through status such as age, gender, education or title. (Reeve, 2007) One method that could switch been used to improve communications would be discover been to have a facilitator present to encounter that each companionship had the same derive of time to express his or her opinions. some other improvement would have been a flip of setting from the informal setting to a more professional seating order that may have helped foster communication between all parties present, such as a round table or face to face seating.\r\nThe second video reviewed is: homework the Playground. The group consists of three males and two females; three Caucasians and two minorities. The video case opens with two new members, one a younger male, slam and one older woman, Betty, meeting the team for the first time. There seems to be two slightly awkward moments when Ray first only offers to shake the guides of the men at the table and when he has trouble pronouncing the cause of the nonage female Iesha. The moment was defused quickly when Iesha decided to make a small joke about her name to ease the tension and held out her own hand in greeting. Betty seemed uncertain about discourseing and said she only joined the team to make friends. communication theory between the team started out stiff and thick entirely by using â€Å"team talk,” (the disposition of the language that group members use as they work together.\r\nNot only does team talk enable group members to share information and express opinions, but analysis of team talk similarly â€Å"reveals where the team is coming from and where the team is headed.) (Reeve, 2007, Ch. 5 pg. 124, Para. 2), team drawing card David kept the discussion flowing and move it to the sour ce they were there. The role the diversity of the group played in their communication was the different experiences each had to bring to the discussion. Iesha plainly liked research and set numbers and offered not only a sound dollar amount to strive for but reasoning behind it. Ray countered that he thinks the amount should be higher but offered no real reason as did Phil who cute the amount lower. After deciding to compromise they moved to fundraising. The immediate response to Betty’s suggestion of having a Bake sale was obvious. They did not take her insert seriously at all but again the team leader chimed in before their dismissive attitude could be considered rude and insulting. Diversity was also not a strong hindrance to the group dismantle though the potential was there.\r\nConflict guidance techniques were used by the group by expressing elicit in solving the problem and keeping their footprint and language non-threatening, using phrases like â€Å"well, yes but let’s look at it from a different angle” or â€Å"that’s a nigh(a) idea but may not be exactly what we need now.”The use of team speak was a very effective communication beam that kept the team focused and on track. Another important tool that was used was nonverbal. The seating exhibition at the table permitted members to have their soulal infinite but still be able to have direct eye contact. According to Reeve, each person’s choice of seating position in groups has a direct effect on interaction and influence. A number of studies have demonstrated that group members prefercorner-to-corner or side-by-side seating for cooperative activities. Such an arrangement allows them to be close abundant to share materials. (Reeve, 2007, CH. 5 pg. 138, Para 1) The team in this case admit did show good communication skills on the all in all but the one improvement would have been to en convinced(predicate) that before the meeting took place, that each member silent what the reason for the meeting was.\r\nThe last video reviewed is realistic discourse. This video is a presentation of three people meeting as a team via meeting call. The third unseen member is not auditory sense to what is being said by the manager or his coworker. This is obvious because when they ask him a question he pauses or stutters, then repeats something that uncomplete of the other participants rattling said. Listening is important in any group so that you can be sure to get all the available information as well as know exactly what is pass judgment of you. This is even more so in the virtual craft work when team members are not in reality sitting face to face. Charlie is neither earreach to what is being said or to the messages that were contained in Ellen’s netmail or voice mails to him. According to the text, Effective audience in virtual groups requires adapting to a different sensitive of expression Your only adaptation is mak ing sure that your microphone is on or off at appropriate times. In an email discussion, however, you can neither see nor hear participants, but you still moldiness â€Å"listen” to their messages. (Reeve, 2007, Ch.6, Pg,.168)The disadvantage of group meetings using a virtual medium is that you can fake listening by answering â€Å"I agree” or a non-committal sound. You can also pretend you didn’t hear something that you don’t want to continue as Ellen does in this video when Charlie tries to place the hip-hop on her.\r\nCharlie did not effectively use any of his listening skills while on this call. It was apparent by his distracted â€Å"non-answers” that he was not listening. The entire time out is not necessarily Charlie’s; it is not know if he ever fully understood what was expected of him from the first meeting. If he had at any time used one listening skill such as paraphrasing he might have had enough clarification to get his assig nment done in time.\r\nParaphrasing is a form of feedback that one lets the speaker know you are listening and gives them the opportunity to clarify their statement. Paraphrasing can be used for multiple purposes such as: To ensure comprehension before evaluation; to ensure others that you want to understand them; to clear up mental confusion and ask for clarification; and to help other’s reach their own conclusions. (Reeve, 2007)\r\nReferences\r\nEngleberg, I. Wynn,D. 2007. Working in Groups: Communication Principles and Strategies (4th ed.) Allyn & Bacon Publishers.\r\nThe Collaboration Tool Box. 2002-2003. MIT. Online resource. Retreived online January 12, 2009 from http://web.mit.e\r\n'